"H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I realise it's a bit clunky, but is the attached patch OK? >> Tested on mipsisa64-elf, where it restores the build, and on >> x86_64-linux-gnu. >> >> Richard >> >> >> gcc/ >> * dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_descriptor): Ignore DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE >> for frame- and argument-pointer reg+offset expressions. >> > > It looks the same as > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01815.html
Ah! Yes indeed. > and my patch has 2 testcases. Point taken, but for the record, I didn't think testcases were needed for mine, since it's a build breaker for a primary target... Richard
