On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Alternatively, one could change the conventions to match an emacs
> style.  Either is fine we me, as long as the style is reasonable.

It is really nice to be able to use 5 year old emacsen out of the box on the 
source tree and have it just work.  I'd vote for that...

Reply via email to