On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:30:12PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> I've done the following:
> - refactored the pass such that it now scans at most twice over all
> instructions.
> - updated the patch to be applicable to current trunk
> - updated the motivating example to a more applicable one (as discussed in
> this thread), and added that one as test-case.
> - added a part in the header comment illustrating the working of the pass
> on the motivating example.
>
> bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64 and i686.
>
> build and reg-tested on mips, mips64, and arm.
How does this relate to the ree.c pass we already have?
Why is not REE sufficient for you? Having two different zero/sign extension
elimination passes would be really wierd.
Jakub
