Features from a cpu or base architecture that were explicitly disabled
by a +nofeat option were being incorrectly added back in before checking
for conflicts between -mcpu and -march options.  This patch instead
compares the returned feature masks directly.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_override_options): Compare
        returned feature masks directly.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c: Prune warning.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_2.c: Ditto.


diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 
ad31e9d255c05dda00c7c2b4755ccec33ae2c83d..330a04c147a97bcd99d6819290d7f82ff5066a44
 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -19282,13 +19282,10 @@ aarch64_override_options (void)
         cpu features would end up disabling an achitecture feature.  In
         otherwords the cpu features need to be a strict superset of the arch
         features and if so prefer the -march ISA flags.  */
-      auto full_arch_flags = arch->flags | arch_isa;
-      auto full_cpu_flags = cpu->flags | cpu_isa;
-      if (~full_cpu_flags & full_arch_flags)
+      if (~cpu_isa & arch_isa)
        {
          std::string ext_diff
-           = aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags (full_arch_flags,
-                                                         full_cpu_flags);
+           = aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags (arch_isa, cpu_isa);
          warning (0, "switch %<-mcpu=%s%> conflicts with %<-march=%s%> switch "
                      "and resulted in options %qs being added",
                       aarch64_cpu_string,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c
index 
3b354c0611092b1fb66e4a9c2098a9806c749825..f13e5e2560cd43aab570ab5d240e4cf1975d2f12
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcpu=thunderx+nofp -march=armv8-a" } */
+/* { dg-prune-output "warning: switch .* conflicts" } */
 
 #include "arm_neon.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_2.c
index 
d0a62b83351b671d157ec0de083d681394056d79..ab2549228a7fa06aa26592e02d0d2055f6b990ed
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcpu=thunderx+nofp -march=armv8-a" } */
+/* { dg-prune-output "warning: switch .* conflicts" } */
 
 /* Make sure that we don't ICE when dealing with vector parameters
    in a simd-tagged function within a non-simd translation unit.  */

Reply via email to