Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps
14?
-- >8 --
When a generic lambda calls an overload set containing an iobj member
function we speculatively capture 'this'. We need to do the same
for an xobj member function.
PR c++/119038
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* lambda.cc (maybe_generic_this_capture): Consider xobj
member functions as well, not just iobj.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc
index 09898f6746c..9679fdc1a2d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ maybe_generic_this_capture (tree object, tree fns)
for (lkp_iterator iter (fns); iter; ++iter)
if (((!id_expr && TREE_CODE (*iter) != USING_DECL)
|| TREE_CODE (*iter) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
- && DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (*iter))
+ && DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (*iter))
{
/* Found a non-static member. Capture this. */
lambda_expr_this_capture (lam, /*maybe*/-1);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..369f0895ed1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/119038
+// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
+
+struct A {
+ void f() {
+ [&](auto x) { g(x); h(x); }(0);
+ }
+
+ void g(this A&, int);
+ void h(this auto&, auto);
+};
--
2.49.0.rc0
