On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We can implement atomic_fetch_sub with atomic_fetch_add and inverted
> operand 2. However, we have to prevent overflows with negation, so
> only const_int operand 2 is allowed in the expander.
>
> 2012-08-02  Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>
>
>         PR target/54087
>         * config/i386/sync.md (atomic_fetch_sub<mode>): New expander.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
>
> I will wait for a day for possible comments.

Patch attached again, this time with a testcase.

2012-08-02  Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>

        PR target/54087
        * gcc.target/i386/pr54087.c: New test.

Uros.
Index: config/i386/sync.md
===================================================================
--- config/i386/sync.md (revision 190111)
+++ config/i386/sync.md (working copy)
@@ -520,6 +520,31 @@
   return "lock{%;} add{<imodesuffix>}\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}";
 })
 
+;; We can use atomic_fetch_add with negated operand 2 to implement
+;; atomic_fetch_sub.  We have to prevent overflows with negation, so
+;; only const_int operand 2 is allowed.
+(define_expand "atomic_fetch_sub<mode>"
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI 0 "register_operand")
+       (unspec_volatile:SWI
+         [(match_operand:SWI 1 "memory_operand")
+          (match_operand:SI 3 "const_int_operand")]            ;; model
+         UNSPECV_XCHG))
+   (set (match_dup 1)
+       (minus:SWI (match_dup 1)
+                  (match_operand:SWI 2 "const_int_operand")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "TARGET_XADD"
+{
+  /* Avoid overflows.  */
+  if (mode_signbit_p (<MODE>mode, operands[2]))
+    FAIL;
+
+  emit_insn (gen_atomic_fetch_add<mode> (operands[0], operands[1],
+                                        negate_rtx (<MODE>mode, operands[2]),
+                                        operands[3]));
+  DONE;
+})
+
 ;; Recall that xchg implicitly sets LOCK#, so adding it again wastes space.
 ;; In addition, it is always a full barrier, so we can ignore the memory model.
 (define_insn "atomic_exchange<mode>"
Index: testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54087.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54087.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54087.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-march=i486" { target ia32 } } */
+
+int v;
+
+int foo (void)
+{
+  return __atomic_sub_fetch (&v, 5, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "xadd" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "cmpxchg" } } */

Reply via email to