On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think we really want that (machine dependent passes). It seems > we cannot get away with it (so we have mdreorg). Allowing (some) flexibility > where to put mdreorg is ok, using two different mechanisms (mdreorg and > a "plugin") sounds odd and is IMHO bad for consistency. I think we definitely want machine dependent passes. E.g., reg-stack should be one. The passes should live by normal rules, they shouldn't be like mdreorg. I don't really care about the mechanism as long as it exists. Ian
