Its ok. I am glad you are catching all these, it makes me rethink and recheck.
Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -----Original Message----- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:29 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Remove unwanted static chain. On 08/08/12 13:27, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > Hello Aldy, > The only time we will get into this function (cp_parser_cilk_for) is > when the fcilkplus is turned on. > > Here is the original call for this function (line #9983) : > > if (!flag_enable_cilk) > fatal_error ("-fcilkplus must be enabled to use %<cilk_for%>"); > else > statement = cp_parser_cilk_for (parser, (tree) NULL_TREE, > parser->in_statement); > Whoops, my bad. I should catch up on the rest of your changes before commenting :). Carry on...