Its ok. I am glad you are catching all these,  it makes me rethink and recheck.

Thanks,

Balaji V. Iyer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:29 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Remove unwanted static chain.

On 08/08/12 13:27, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Aldy,
>       The only time we will get into this function (cp_parser_cilk_for) is 
> when the fcilkplus is turned on.
>
> Here is the original call for this function (line #9983) :
>
>      if (!flag_enable_cilk)
>          fatal_error ("-fcilkplus must be enabled to use %<cilk_for%>");
>        else
>          statement = cp_parser_cilk_for (parser, (tree) NULL_TREE, 
> parser->in_statement);
>

Whoops, my bad.  I should catch up on the rest of your changes before 
commenting :).

Carry on...

Reply via email to