On 8/8/12, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2012 Lawrence Crowl <cr...@google.com> wrote:
> > We should probably think about naming conventions for mutating
> > operations, as I expect we will want them eventually.
>
> Right. In the end I would prefer explicit constructors.
I don't think we're thinking about the same thing.
I'm talking about member functions like mystring.append ("foo").
The += operator is mutating as well.
Constructors do not mutate, they create.
--
Lawrence Crowl
