On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 23:42, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It seems to me that this > > > sanity check is checking that it's a cast between > > > references for the other ones, and that's just unsuitable for > > > to_underlying. I would suggest just removing that sanity > > > check and trusting the library. > > > > That's fine too. > > I'll test the attached. Tested on Linux-PPC64 (gcc112), changelogs as before, ok for trunk?