On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 23:42, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > It seems to me that this
> > > sanity check is checking that it's a cast between
> > > references for the other ones, and that's just unsuitable for
> > > to_underlying. I would suggest just removing that sanity
> > > check and trusting the library.
> >
> > That's fine too.
>
> I'll test the attached.

Tested on Linux-PPC64 (gcc112), changelogs as before, ok for trunk?

Reply via email to