The patch tries to solve miss vectorization for below case. void foo (int* a, int* restrict b) { b[0] = a[0] * a[64]; b[1] = a[65] * a[1]; b[2] = a[2] * a[66]; b[3] = a[67] * a[3]; b[4] = a[68] * a[4]; b[5] = a[69] * a[5]; b[6] = a[6] * a[70]; b[7] = a[7] * a[71]; }
In vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses, a[0], a[1], .. a[7], a[64], ..., a[71] are in same group with size of 71. It caused vectorization unprofitable. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}. Ok for trunk? gcc/ChangeLog: * tree-vect-data-refs.cc (vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses): Split datarefs when there's a gap bigger than MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_MODE. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c: New test. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b0d3e5a3cb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr119181.c @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +void +foo (int* a, int* restrict b) +{ + b[0] = a[0] * a[64]; + b[1] = a[65] * a[1]; + b[2] = a[2] * a[66]; + b[3] = a[67] * a[3]; + b[4] = a[68] * a[4]; + b[5] = a[69] * a[5]; + b[6] = a[6] * a[70]; + b[7] = a[7] * a[71]; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimized: basic block" 1 "slp2" { target vect_int_mult } } } */ diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc index 9fd1ef29650..387e8ac8b61 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc @@ -3657,6 +3657,12 @@ vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses (vec_info *vinfo, && init_a <= init_prev && init_prev <= init_b); + /* For datarefs with big gap, it's better to split them into different + groups. + .i.e a[0], a[1], a[2], .. a[7], a[100], a[101],..., a[107] */ + if ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)(init_b - init_prev) * tree_to_uhwi (szb) + > MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_MODE / BITS_PER_UNIT) + break; /* Do not place the same access in the interleaving chain twice. */ if (init_b == init_prev) { -- 2.34.1