On Tue, 3 Jun 2025, Martin Uecker wrote: > This version only contains the fix for -Wc++-compat. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested for x86_64. > > Martin > > > c: Enable -Wjump-misses-init for -Wc++-compat > > Fix a typo that prevented the warning from being activated with > -Wc++compat. > > gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: > * c.opts (Wjump-misses-init): Fix typo. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > * gcc.dg/Wjump-misses-init-3.c: New test.
OK. Note 1: the opt*.awk scripts aren't generally very good at error checking. If we don't already have a bug open for missing checks for unknown keywords such as "LangEnabledby", one should be filed. Note 2: I'm not sure what -Wc++-compat is meant to do with C code using features that are only in newer C++ versions, such as the label at the end of a compound statement in the new test (a new feature in C23 and C++23). But adding a semicolon there would avoid any question about whether -Wc++-compat should also be warning about that label or not. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
