On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 06:12:13PM +0100, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 04:41:21PM +0100, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > > Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This seems to be causing a build regression on the or1k port.
> > > >
> > > > I have not quite figured it out yet but I have bisected to this commit.
> > > >
> > > > The failure is as below, this seems to be caused by the cstoresi4 
> > > > instruction produced by
> > > > or1k.md.  So I think its likely something we are doing funny in the 
> > > > port.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to Jeff for pointing this out.  If you have any idea let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > >
> > > >     during RTL pass: ce1
> > > >     dump file: libgcc2.c.286r.ce1
> > > >     /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function 
> > > > '__muldi3':
> > > >     /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.c:538:1: 
> > > > internal compiler error: in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4492
> > > >       538 | }
> > > >           | ^
> > > >     0x1b094df internal_error(char const*, ...)
> > > >             
> > > > /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517
> > > >     0x6459c1 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.cc:1815
> > > >     0x473a2e emit_move_multi_word
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/expr.cc:4492
> > > >     0x93fd7d emit_move_insn(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/expr.cc:4746
> > > >     0x9175f1 copy_to_reg(rtx_def*)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/explow.cc:630
> > > >     0xd18977 gen_lowpart_general(machine_mode, rtx_def*)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/rtlhooks.cc:56
> > > >     0x9414c7 convert_mode_scalar
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/expr.cc:818
> > > >     0x9421a1 convert_modes(machine_mode, machine_mode, rtx_def*, int)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/expr.cc:961
> > > >     0xc0afa0 prepare_operand(insn_code, rtx_def*, int, machine_mode, 
> > > > machine_mode, int)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/optabs.cc:4637
> > > >     0xc0b33a prepare_cmp_insn
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/optabs.cc:4538
> > > >     0xc0f0dd emit_conditional_move(rtx_def*, rtx_comparison, rtx_def*, 
> > > > rtx_def*, machine_mode, int)
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/optabs.cc:5098
> > > >     0x192cc7b noce_emit_cmove
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:1777
> > > >     0x193365b try_emit_cmove_seq
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:3410
> > > >     0x193365b noce_convert_multiple_sets_1
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:3705
> > > >     0x1933c71 noce_convert_multiple_sets
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:3496
> > > >     0x1938687 noce_process_if_block
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:4045
> > > >     0x1938687 noce_find_if_block
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:4726
> > > >     0x1938687 find_if_header
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:4931
> > > >     0x1938687 if_convert
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:6078
> > > >     0x1938d01 rest_of_handle_if_conversion
> > > >             /home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/ifcvt.cc:6143
> > > >
> > > > -Stafford
> > > 
> > > Can you attach the .i?
> > 
> > Sure please find attached, I can reproduce with the or1k compiler using:
> > 
> >   $HOME/work/gnu-toolchain/build-gcc/./gcc/cc1 -O2  __muldi3.i
> > 
> > I am still debugging, but I notice when reverting the patch the compiler 
> > never
> > goes to emit_move_multi_word().  I am trying to work backwards as to where 
> > it goes
> > different, it's just taking a bit of time as I haven't debugged GCC ICE's 
> > for a
> > while.
> 
> I made some progress on this.  In openRISC we generate cstoresi4 with special
> register SR_F (condition flag) bit register.
> 
> This is represented as (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f).
> 
> The RTL produced for cstoresi4 becomes something like:
> 
>      // The compare
>      (insn 49 48 50 (set (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f)
>             (leu:BI (reg/v:SI 68 [ __x2D.6783 ])
>                 (reg/v:SI 69 [ __x1D.6782 ]))) 
> "/home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.c":532:22 -1
>          (nil)
>      // The conditional branch
>      (jump_insn 50 49 0 (set (pc)
>            (if_then_else (ne (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f)
>                    (const_int 0 [0]))
>                (label_ref 0)
>                (pc))) 
> "/home/shorne/work/gnu-toolchain/gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.c":532:22 -1
>         (int_list:REG_BR_PROB 536870916 (nil)))
> 
> During ce1 the try_emit_cmove_seq would try to convert (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f) to 
> SI.
> Before this patch it was done in gen_lowpart_general by
> simplify_context::simplify_gen_subreg.
> 
> The simplity to subreg operation would convert:
>   (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f)
> 
> To:
>   (subreg:SI (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f) 0)
> 
> But now the call to validate_subreg is returning false and simplify_gen_subreg
> returns NULL_RTX, this causes gen_lowpart_general to try to do copy_to_reg,
> which fails.
> 
> I need to step away for a bit, but I would next look into why validate_subreg
> is now failing to allow (reg:BI 34 ?sr_f) to be subreg'd.

I think that the REG_CAN_CHANGE_MODE_P call in validate_subreg is
rejecting the subreg, because or1k_can_change_mode_class rejects the
mode change of sr_f from BI to SI.

Regards,
Dimitar

> 
> -Stafford

Reply via email to