On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 1:19 PM Cui, Lili <lili....@intel.com> wrote: > > From: Lili Cui <lili....@intel.com> > > Hi Uros, > > I need to remove another assertion in the shrink wrap separate patch. Added > two cases for changing the CHECK_STACK_LIMIT value. > > The default values for CHECK_STACK_LIMIT for target wingw and option > -mstack-arg-probe are 4000 and (-1) respectively. In this case, shrink wrap > separate will go to the branch. This assertion needs to be removed. > > Sergei verified the patch in his environment, and it passed the test. > Bootstrapped & regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Ok for master? > > Thanks, > Lili. > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > PR target/120741 > * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_prologue): > Remove 1 assertions. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR target/120741 > * gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c: New test. > * gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c: Likewise.
OK if the tests also pass for i?86-*-*. Thanks, Uros. > > --- > gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 2 -- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > index fc3105919f4..84081ab1267 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > @@ -9443,8 +9443,6 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) > } > else > { > - gcc_assert (!crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate); > - > rtx eax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG); > rtx r10 = NULL; > const bool sp_is_cfa_reg = (m->fs.cfa_reg == stack_pointer_rtx); > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..b59a58c48b8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mstack-arg-probe" } */ > + > +short __mingw_swformat_format; > +__builtin_va_list __mingw_swformat_arg; > +int __mingw_swformat_fc; > +typedef struct { > + void *fp; > + int bch[1024]; > +} _IFP; > +void __mingw_swformat(_IFP *s) { > + if (s->fp) > + while (__mingw_swformat_format) > + if (__mingw_swformat_fc == 'A') > + *__builtin_va_arg(__mingw_swformat_arg, double *) = 0; > +} > +void > +__mingw_vswscanf (void) > +{ > + _IFP ifp; > + __mingw_swformat(&ifp); > +} > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..58635e49647 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-mingw* *-*-cygwin* } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-std=gnu99 -O2" } */ > + > +short __mingw_swformat_format; > +__builtin_va_list __mingw_swformat_arg; > +int __mingw_swformat_fc; > +typedef struct { > + void *fp; > + int bch[1024]; > +} _IFP; > +void __mingw_swformat(_IFP *s) { > + if (s->fp) > + while (__mingw_swformat_format) > + if (__mingw_swformat_fc == 'A') > + *__builtin_va_arg(__mingw_swformat_arg, double *) = 0; > +} > +void > +__mingw_vswscanf (void) > +{ > + _IFP ifp; > + __mingw_swformat(&ifp); > +} > -- > 2.34.1 >