On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 1:19 PM Cui, Lili <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Lili Cui <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Uros,
>
> I need to remove another assertion in the shrink wrap separate patch. Added
> two cases for changing the CHECK_STACK_LIMIT value.
>
> The default values for CHECK_STACK_LIMIT for target wingw and option
> -mstack-arg-probe are 4000 and (-1) respectively. In this case, shrink wrap
> separate will go to the branch. This assertion needs to be removed.
>
> Sergei verified the patch in his environment, and it passed the test.
> Bootstrapped & regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Lili.
>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/120741
> * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_prologue):
> Remove 1 assertions.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/120741
> * gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c: Likewise.
OK if the tests also pass for i?86-*-*.
Thanks,
Uros.
>
> ---
> gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 2 --
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> index fc3105919f4..84081ab1267 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -9443,8 +9443,6 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void)
> }
> else
> {
> - gcc_assert (!crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate);
> -
> rtx eax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
> rtx r10 = NULL;
> const bool sp_is_cfa_reg = (m->fs.cfa_reg == stack_pointer_rtx);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..b59a58c48b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr120741.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mstack-arg-probe" } */
> +
> +short __mingw_swformat_format;
> +__builtin_va_list __mingw_swformat_arg;
> +int __mingw_swformat_fc;
> +typedef struct {
> + void *fp;
> + int bch[1024];
> +} _IFP;
> +void __mingw_swformat(_IFP *s) {
> + if (s->fp)
> + while (__mingw_swformat_format)
> + if (__mingw_swformat_fc == 'A')
> + *__builtin_va_arg(__mingw_swformat_arg, double *) = 0;
> +}
> +void
> +__mingw_vswscanf (void)
> +{
> + _IFP ifp;
> + __mingw_swformat(&ifp);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..58635e49647
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/shrink-wrap-separate-mingw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-mingw* *-*-cygwin* } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=gnu99 -O2" } */
> +
> +short __mingw_swformat_format;
> +__builtin_va_list __mingw_swformat_arg;
> +int __mingw_swformat_fc;
> +typedef struct {
> + void *fp;
> + int bch[1024];
> +} _IFP;
> +void __mingw_swformat(_IFP *s) {
> + if (s->fp)
> + while (__mingw_swformat_format)
> + if (__mingw_swformat_fc == 'A')
> + *__builtin_va_arg(__mingw_swformat_arg, double *) = 0;
> +}
> +void
> +__mingw_vswscanf (void)
> +{
> + _IFP ifp;
> + __mingw_swformat(&ifp);
> +}
> --
> 2.34.1
>