On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 03:20, Patrick Palka <ppa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > When checking __is_complete_or_unbounded on a reference to incomplete
> > type, we overeagerly try to instantiate/complete the referenced type
> > which besides being unnecessary may also produce a -Wsfinae-incomplete
> > warning (added in r16-1527) if the referenced type is later defined.
> >
> > This patch fixes this by effectively restricting the sizeof check to
> > object (except unknown-bound array) types.  In passing simplify the
> > implementation by using is_object instead of is_function/reference/void.
> >
> >         PR libstdc++/120717
> >
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * include/std/type_traits (__is_complete_or_unbounded): Don't
> >         check sizeof on a reference or unbounded array type.  Simplify
> >         using is_object.  Correct formatting.
> >         * testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc: New test.
> > ---
> >  libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits          | 34 +++++++++----------
> >  .../is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc        | 20 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 
> > libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits 
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > index abff9f880001..28960befd2c7 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > @@ -280,11 +280,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >
> >    // Forward declarations
> >    template<typename>
> > -    struct is_reference;
> > -  template<typename>
> > -    struct is_function;
> > -  template<typename>
> > -    struct is_void;
> > +    struct is_object;
> >    template<typename>
> >      struct remove_cv;
> >    template<typename>
> > @@ -297,18 +293,22 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >    // Helper functions that return false_type for incomplete classes,
> >    // incomplete unions and arrays of known bound from those.
> >
> > -  template <typename _Tp, size_t = sizeof(_Tp)>
> > -    constexpr true_type __is_complete_or_unbounded(__type_identity<_Tp>)
> > -    { return {}; }
> > -
> > -  template <typename _TypeIdentity,
> > -      typename _NestedType = typename _TypeIdentity::type>
> > -    constexpr typename __or_<
> > -      is_reference<_NestedType>,
> > -      is_function<_NestedType>,
> > -      is_void<_NestedType>,
> > -      __is_array_unknown_bounds<_NestedType>
> > -    >::type __is_complete_or_unbounded(_TypeIdentity)
> > +  // More specialized overload for complete object types.
> > +  template<typename _Tp,
> > +          typename = __enable_if_t<!__or_<__not_<is_object<_Tp>>,
> > +                                          
> > __is_array_unknown_bounds<_Tp>>::value>,
> 
> Maybe it's because I'm congested and my head feels like it's full of
> potatoes, but the double negative is confusing for me.
> 
> Would __and_<is_object<T>, __not_<__is_array_unknown_bounds<T>> work?
> 
> We could even name that:
> 
> // An object type which is not an unbounded array.
> // It might still be an incomplete type, but if this is false_type
> // then we can be certain it's not a complete object type.
> template<typename _Tp>
>   using __maybe_complete_object_type = ...;

I like it.

> 
> 
> > +          size_t = sizeof(_Tp)>
> > +    constexpr true_type
> > +    __is_complete_or_unbounded(__type_identity<_Tp>)
> > +    { return {}; };
> > +
> > +  // Less specialized overload for reference and unknown-bound array 
> > types, and
> > +  // incomplete types.
> > +  template<typename _TypeIdentity,
> > +          typename _NestedType = typename _TypeIdentity::type>
> > +    constexpr typename __or_<__not_<is_object<_NestedType>>,
> > +                            __is_array_unknown_bounds<_NestedType>>::type
> 
> Then this would be __not_<__maybe_complete_object_type<_NestedType>>
> but maybe that's as bad as the double negative above.

The new helper definitely makes things clearer to me.  Like so?

-- >8 --

Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Unnecessary type completion in
 __is_complete_or_unbounded [PR120717]

When checking __is_complete_or_unbounded on a reference to incomplete
type, we overeagerly try to instantiate/complete the referenced type
which besides being unnecessary may also produce a -Wsfinae-incomplete
warning (added in r16-1527) if the referenced type is later defined.

This patch fixes this by effectively restricting the sizeof check to
object (except unknown-bound array) types.  In passing simplify the
implementation by using is_object instead of is_function/reference/void
and introducing a __maybe_complete_object_type helper.

        PR libstdc++/120717

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        * include/std/type_traits (__maybe_complete_object_type): New
        trait, factored out from ...
        (__is_complete_or_unbounded): ... here.  Only check sizeof on a
        __maybe_complete_object_type type.  Fix formatting.
        * testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc: New test.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits          | 39 +++++++++++--------
 .../is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc        | 20 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits 
b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
index abff9f880001..055411195f17 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
@@ -280,11 +280,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 
   // Forward declarations
   template<typename>
-    struct is_reference;
-  template<typename>
-    struct is_function;
-  template<typename>
-    struct is_void;
+    struct is_object;
   template<typename>
     struct remove_cv;
   template<typename>
@@ -294,21 +290,30 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
   template<typename>
     struct __is_array_unknown_bounds;
 
+  // An object type which is not an unbounded array.
+  // It might still be an incomplete type, but if this is false_type
+  // then we can be certain it's not a complete object type.
+  template<typename _Tp>
+    using __maybe_complete_object_type
+      = __and_<is_object<_Tp>, __not_<__is_array_unknown_bounds<_Tp>>>;
+
   // Helper functions that return false_type for incomplete classes,
   // incomplete unions and arrays of known bound from those.
 
-  template <typename _Tp, size_t = sizeof(_Tp)>
-    constexpr true_type __is_complete_or_unbounded(__type_identity<_Tp>)
-    { return {}; }
-
-  template <typename _TypeIdentity,
-      typename _NestedType = typename _TypeIdentity::type>
-    constexpr typename __or_<
-      is_reference<_NestedType>,
-      is_function<_NestedType>,
-      is_void<_NestedType>,
-      __is_array_unknown_bounds<_NestedType>
-    >::type __is_complete_or_unbounded(_TypeIdentity)
+  // More specialized overload for complete object types (returning true_type).
+  template<typename _Tp,
+          typename = __enable_if_t<__maybe_complete_object_type<_Tp>::value>,
+          size_t = sizeof(_Tp)>
+    constexpr true_type
+    __is_complete_or_unbounded(__type_identity<_Tp>)
+    { return {}; };
+
+  // Less specialized overload for reference and unknown-bound array types
+  // (returning true_type), and incomplete types (returning false_type).
+  template<typename _TypeIdentity,
+          typename _NestedType = typename _TypeIdentity::type>
+    constexpr typename __not_<__maybe_complete_object_type<_NestedType>>::type
+    __is_complete_or_unbounded(_TypeIdentity)
     { return {}; }
 
   // __remove_cv_t (std::remove_cv_t for C++11).
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..31fdf8fe9227
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/is_complete_or_unbounded/120717.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// PR libstdc++/120717
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wsfinae-incomplete" }
+
+#include <type_traits>
+
+// Verify __is_complete_or_unbounded doesn't try to instantiate the underlying
+// type of a reference or array of unknown bound.
+template<class T> struct A { static_assert(false, "do not instantiate"); };
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<A<int>&>{}),
 "");
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<A<int>&&>{}),
 "");
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<A<int>[]>{}),
 "");
+
+// Verify __is_complete_or_unbounded doesn't produce -Wsfinae-incomplete
+// warnings.
+struct B;
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<B&>{}), "");
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<B&&>{}), 
"");
+static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(std::__type_identity<B[]>{}), 
"");
+struct B { }; // { dg-bogus "-Wsfinae-incomplete" }
-- 
2.50.0.81.gcb3b40381e

Reply via email to