Hi,

when compiling gimple-range-op.cc, clang issues warning:

  gimple-range-op.cc:1419:18: warning: comparison of different enumeration 
types in switch statement ('combined_fn' and 'built_in_function') 
[-Wenum-compare-switch]

which I hope is harmless, but all other switch cases use CFN_ prefixed
constants, so I guess the ISINF case should too.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linx.  OK for master?

Alternatively, as with all of these clang warning issues, I'm
perfectly happy to add an entry to contrib/filter-clang-warnings.py to
ignore the warning instead.

Thanks,

Martin



gcc/ChangeLog:

2025-06-23  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>

        * gimple-range-op.cc
        (gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call): Use
        CFN_BUILT_IN_ISINF instead of BUILT_IN_ISINF.
---
 gcc/gimple-range-op.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
index 90a61971489..c9bc5c0c6b9 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call ()
       m_operator = &op_cfn_signbit;
       break;
 
-    CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_ISINF):
+    CASE_FLT_FN (CFN_BUILT_IN_ISINF):
       m_op1 = gimple_call_arg (call, 0);
       m_operator = &op_cfn_isinf;
       break;
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to