Hi Harald,
thanks for the review. Pushed all three parts as gcc-16-1698-g24940ad1534.
A backport to gcc-15 of the first part of the patch, aka this one, seems to be
feasible. I'd like to give the patch a bit time to mature here in gcc-16 and
backport in about a week, when I do not forget it.
Thanks again,
Andre
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 22:24:46 +0200
Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 25.06.25 um 13:39 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > attached patch fixes an out of bounds access in the clean up code of a
> > concatenating array constructor. A fragment like
> >
> > list = [ list, something() ]
> >
> > lead to clean up using an offset (of the list array) that was manipulated in
> > the loop copying the existing array elements and at the end pointing to one
> > element past the list (after the concatenation).
> >
> > This fixes a 15-regression. Releases prior to 15 do not have the out
> > of bounds access in the (non existing) clean up code. The have a memory
> > leak instead.
> >
> > Regtested ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> Given the severity of the bug, do you plan to backport to 15-branch?
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> Harald
>
> > The subject says, that there will be 3 patches. Only this one fixes the bug.
> > The other fixes I found while hunting this issue and because they play in
> > the general same area, I don't want to loose them. I therefore publish them
> > in this context.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
>
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
