On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 21:43 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > > Thanks. Let's hope that I can squeeze in some more stuff while > > stage 1 lasts. :T > > You know that for backend-specific changes (especially for "smaller" > ports) you actually have some more leeway?
You mean, since SH is neither a primary nor a secondary platform, there are no particular release criteria for it? What does that actually mean? > > But now that you mention it, maybe it would be better to rename the > > '-menable-tas' option to '-mtas', since other instruction related > > options do not have 'enabled' in the name. > > Now still would be time to do so without worrying about compatibility. ;-) True. Cheers, Oleg
