On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 01:36:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Anyway, I might be able to deal with the indirect call not being r11, > > but it'll take a bit of prodding. Also it will shatter my plans to move > > the hash to eax to save a few bytes in instruction encoding. Let me go > > poke around with that UDB patch see what's possible. > > I think I have it mostly working to force r11 when doing kcfi and > retpoline now, though I'm seeing a few glitches still. I'll keep working > on it.
Awesome, thanks!
