Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (with and without
--target_board=unix/-fshort-enums), committing as obvious.
-- >8 --
Linaro CI informed me that this test fails on ARM thumb-m7-hard-eabi.
This appears to be because the target defaults to -fshort-enums, and so
the mangled names are inaccurate.
This patch just disables the implicit type enum test for this case.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C: Disable implicit enum test for
-fshort-enums.
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanielosh...@gmail.com>
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C
index 4f05d663ab8..ed68656f8c5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ template<auto V> int Frob () { return int (V); }
enum { A = (unsigned int)12345, B = 0 };
template int Frob<A> ();
template int Frob<B> ();
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaLUej1A12345EEiv:} { target c++20 }
} }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaLUej1A12345EEiv:} { target { c++20
&& { ! short_enums } } } } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaL8._anon_012345EEiv:} { target
c++17_down } } }
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaLUej1A0EEiv:} { target c++20 } } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaLUej1A0EEiv:} { target { c++20 &&
{ ! short_enums } } } } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler {_Z4FrobITnDaL8._anon_00EEiv:} { target
c++17_down } } }
enum { C = 5 } typedef X;
--
2.47.0
