On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 8:50 PM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 6:30 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For a basic block with only a debug marker:
> >
> > (note 3 0 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> > (note 2 3 5 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> > (debug_insn 5 2 16 2 (debug_marker) "x.c":6:3 -1 (nil))
> >
> > emit the TLS call after debug marker.
> >
> > gcc/
> >
> >         PR target/121668
> >         * config/i386/i386-features.cc (ix86_emit_tls_call): Emit the
> >         TLS call after debug marker.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >
> >         PR target/121668
> >         * gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c: New test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc            | 26 +++++++++++++++++----
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c | 13 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc 
> > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> > index cdb2a0b34b2..93e20947edf 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> > @@ -3806,10 +3806,19 @@ ix86_emit_tls_call (rtx tls_set, x86_cse_kind kind, 
> > basic_block bb,
> >                  (code_label 78 11 77 3 14 (nil) [1 uses])
> >                  (note 77 78 54 3 [bb 3] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> >
> > +                or a basic block with only a debug marker:
> > +
> > +                (note 3 0 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> > +                (note 2 3 5 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> > +                (debug_insn 5 2 16 2 (debug_marker) "x.c":6:3 -1 (nil))
> > +
> >                */
> > -             gcc_assert (NOTE_P (insn)
> > -                         && (NOTE_KIND (insn) == NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG
> > -                             || NOTE_KIND (insn) == 
> > NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK));
> > +             gcc_assert (DEBUG_INSN_P (insn)
> > +                         || (NOTE_P (insn)
> > +                             && ((NOTE_KIND (insn)
> > +                                  == NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> > +                                 || (NOTE_KIND (insn)
> > +                                     == NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK))));
>
> Maybe we should just gcc_assert (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))?

The loop is

     while (insn && !NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

gcc_assert (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn)) isn't needed inside the loop.

        {
          if (insn == BB_END (bb))
            {
              /* This must be the beginning basic block:

                 (note 4 0 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
                 (note 2 4 26 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)

                 or a basic block with only a label:

                 (code_label 78 11 77 3 14 (nil) [1 uses])
                 (note 77 78 54 3 [bb 3] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)

               */
              gcc_assert (NOTE_P (insn)
                          && (NOTE_KIND (insn) == NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG
                              || NOTE_KIND (insn) == NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK));
              insn = NULL;
              break;
            }
          insn = NEXT_INSN (insn);
        }

>
> >               insn = NULL;
> >               break;
> >             }
> > @@ -3854,12 +3863,19 @@ ix86_emit_tls_call (rtx tls_set, x86_cse_kind kind, 
> > basic_block bb,
> >                  (note 4 0 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> >                  (note 2 4 26 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> >
> > -                or after NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK a basic block with only
> > -                a label:
> > +                or after NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK in a basic block with
> > +                only a label:
> >
> >                  (code_label 78 11 77 3 14 (nil) [1 uses])
> >                  (note 77 78 54 3 [bb 3] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> >
> > +                or after debug marker in a basic block with only a
> > +                debug marker:
> > +
> > +                (note 3 0 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> > +                (note 2 3 5 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> > +                (debug_insn 5 2 16 2 (debug_marker) "x.c":6:3 -1 (nil))
> > +
> >                */
> >               insn = insn ? PREV_INSN (insn) : BB_END (bb);
> >               *after_p = insn;
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c 
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..eb553081eb3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr121668-1a.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-linux* } } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-Og -g -fpic -fplt -mtls-dialect=gnu" } */
> > +
> > +typedef int caml_domain_state;
> > +thread_local caml_domain_state caml_state;
> > +void
> > +caml_empty_mark_stack ()
> > +{
> > +  while (caml_state)
> > +    caml_state = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "call\[ \t\]__tls_get_addr@PLT" 1 { 
> > target { ! ia32 } } } } */
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to