> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijks...@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 6:04 PM
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov <ktkac...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Alex Coplan
> <alex.cop...@arm.com>; Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>; Andrew
> Pinski <pins...@gmail.com>; Alice Carlotti <alice.carlo...@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] AArch64: Add isinf expander [PR 66462]
> 
> v2: Add testcase
> 
> Add an expander for isinf using integer arithmetic.  This is
> typically faster and avoids generating spurious exceptions on
> signaling NaNs.  This fixes part of PR66462.
> 
> int isinf1 (float x) { return __builtin_isinf (x); }
> 
> Before:
>       fabs    s0, s0
>       mov     w0, 2139095039
>       fmov    s31, w0
>       fcmp    s0, s31
>       cset    w0, le
>       eor     w0, w0, 1
>       ret
> 
> After:
>       fmov    w1, s0
>       mov     w0, -16777216
>       cmp     w0, w1, lsl 1
>       cset    w0, eq
>       ret
> 
> gcc:
>       PR middle-end/66462
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (isinf<mode>2): Add new expander.
>       * config/aarch64/iterators.md (mantissa_bits): Add new mode_attr.
> 
> testsuite:
>       PR middle-end/66462
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/pr66462.c: Add new test.
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> index
> dc2be815ede6829aa6f8b1f435754c3e98fa5c12..d3bf85d1b67b6b777346fbd9
> a93f59cdc95f53ca 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> @@ -4524,7 +4524,7 @@ (define_insn "fcmpe<mode>"
>    [(set_attr "type" "fcmp<stype>")]
>  )
> 
> -(define_insn "*cmp_swp_<shift>_reg<mode>"
> +(define_insn "cmp_swp_<shift>_reg<mode>"
>    [(set (reg:CC_SWP CC_REGNUM)
>       (compare:CC_SWP (ASHIFT:GPI
>                        (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "r")
> @@ -7716,6 +7716,22 @@ (define_expand "@xorsign<mode>3"
>  }
>  )
> 
> +(define_expand "isinf<mode>2"
> + [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
> +  (match_operand:GPF 1 "register_operand")]
> + "TARGET_FLOAT"
> +{
> +  rtx op = lowpart_subreg (<V_INT_EQUIV>mode, operands[1], <MODE>mode);

I think you forgot the force_lowpart_subreg.

OK with that change.

Thanks,
Tamar

> +  rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (<V_INT_EQUIV>mode);
> +  emit_move_insn (tmp, GEN_INT (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (<mantissa_bits> +
> 1)));
> +  rtx cc_reg = gen_rtx_REG (CC_SWPmode, CC_REGNUM);
> +  emit_insn (gen_cmp_swp_lsl_reg<v_int_equiv> (op, GEN_INT (1), tmp));
> +  rtx cmp = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (EQ, SImode, cc_reg, const0_rtx);
> +  emit_insn (gen_aarch64_cstoresi (operands[0], cmp, cc_reg));
> +  DONE;
> +}
> +)
> +
>  ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------
>  ;; Reload support
>  ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> index
> 8f8237edf6cb07f80beaa5dcf7a7330b06fed3c9..8fea19469baeaf12a3a8acfad11
> 589084c8c4301 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> @@ -1334,6 +1334,8 @@ (define_mode_attr short_mask [(HI "65535") (QI
> "255")])
> 
>  (define_mode_attr half_mask [(HI "255") (SI "65535") (DI "4294967295")])
> 
> +(define_mode_attr mantissa_bits [(SF "23") (DF "52")])
> +
>  ;; For constraints used in scalar immediate vector moves
>  (define_mode_attr hq [(HI "h") (QI "q")])
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr66462.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr66462.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ebd48e922c95cfbccbe65
> 987572b5c1c079bc8c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr66462.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsignaling-nans -fno-inline" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target fenv_exceptions } */
> +
> +#include <fenv.h>
> +
> +static void t_inff (float x, bool res)
> +{
> +  if (__builtin_isinff (x) != res)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +  if (__builtin_isinff (-x) != res)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +  if (fetestexcept (FE_INVALID))
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> +static void t_inf (double x, bool res)
> +{
> +  if (__builtin_isinf (x) != res)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +  if (__builtin_isinf (-x) != res)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +  if (fetestexcept (FE_INVALID))
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  feclearexcept (FE_INVALID);
> +
> +  t_inff (0.0f, 0);
> +  t_inff (1.0f, 0);
> +  t_inff (__builtin_inff (), 1);
> +  t_inff (__builtin_nansf (""), 0);
> +  t_inff (__builtin_nanf (""), 0);
> +
> +  t_inf (0.0, 0);
> +  t_inf (1.0, 0);
> +  t_inf (__builtin_inf (), 1);
> +  t_inf (__builtin_nans (""), 0);
> +  t_inf (__builtin_nan (""), 0);
> +
> +  return 0;
> +}

Reply via email to