Excerpts from Iain Sandoe's message of September 3, 2025 9:59 pm:
> 
> 
>> On 3 Sep 2025, at 20:54, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from Iain Buclaw's message of September 3, 2025 9:19 pm:
>>> Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 3, 2025 10:20 am:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I regularly (but not always) see timeouts on Solaris, both on sparc and
>>>>>> x86:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> WARNING: libphobos.gc/forkgc2.d execution test program timed out.
>>>>>> FAIL: libphobos.gc/forkgc2.d execution test
>>>>>> WARNING: libphobos.gc/startbackgc.d execution test program timed out.
>>>>>> FAIL: libphobos.gc/startbackgc.d execution test
>>>> 
>>>> I haven't tried investigating what's wrong on Solaris with those two,
>>>> but they sure are annoying, especially since they are so unreliable:
>>>> sometimes both PASS, sometimes one or the other, sometimes both.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd thought about skipping them on Solaris, too, just to avoid the noise
>>>> and the timeouts, but haven't gotten around to that.
>>>> 
>>>> However, fixing this at the root would certainly be best.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I currently have a gdb session on cfarm, process has hung for forkgc2, 
>>> and just looking at the backtrace.
>>> 
>>> * There are 11 threads in total (main + 10 new'd Threads)
>>> * All threads are suspended (in sigsuspend) except for two
>>> * The first of those threads is the one that's requested all threads to 
>>>  suspend using pthread_kill(SIGRTMIN), and is stuck inside a sem_wait 
>>>  for one more call to sem_post().
>>> * The second is stuck in a SpinLock.lock loop, called from 
>>>  _prefork_handler() inside forkx() inside fork() - my guess would be 
>>>  the  handler being called is _d_gcx_atfork_prepare().
>>> * Specific to Solaris, I've clocked this line in the forkx 
>>>  implementation:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/blob/a21856a054bd854f39d1d55a6b0d547cb0d2039f/usr/src/lib/libc/port/threads/scalls.c#L177
>>> 
>>> I think what's going on is that the thread that wants to do a GC 
>>> collection has issued a signal to all threads, but Solaris has called 
>>> sigoff() in the last thread being fork'd, so the signal never reaches.
>>> 
>>> This behaviour does not change when COLLECT_FORK is disabled, so Solaris 
>>> would still be affected.
>>> 
>> 
>> I forgot to mention, thread #1 that wants to do a GC has control of the 
>> SpinLock.  So that's why thread #2 is stuck in its current loop.
>> 
>> The order of operations that lead to Solaris hanging at runtime are:
>> 1. Thread #1 calls GC.lockNR() and has hold of the global GC SpinLock.
>> 2. Thread #2 calls fork(). It too calls GC.lockNR() in 
>>   _d_gcx_atfork_prepare() and is waiting for the global lock.
>> 3. Thread #1 decides to call thread_suspendAll() and will never release 
>>   the GC lock until all threads are suspended.
>> 4. Thread #2 will never suspend because Solaris has set sigoff() on it 
>>   until the pthread_atfork prepare handler has returned (it won't).
>> 
>> It would appear that there should be some other fine grained lock to 
>> prevent this kind of deadlock.
> 
> It’s not impossible to imagine something similar happening for Darwin.
> (i.e. masking signals during thread startup) - but I did not poke at the
> sources so far.
> Iain
> 

@Rainers I've synthesised this in a C program, the minimum logic more or 
less copied from druntime itself.

https://gist.github.com/ibuclaw/3e57a4f7690012f49834a7442977b28b

On Solaris/SPARC, I get a hang in the same manner as I described once 
every 5 or so runs.

Interestingly, disabling the "GC" from installing atfork prepare 
handlers does not remove the chance of a deadlock occurring (maybe one 
in every 20 runs), as it would appear that sema_wait() and fork() have 
low level libc lock in common.

The implementation that is free of deadlocks is to use thr_suspend and 
thr_continue instead.  However, this can only work with Druntime on 
Solaris if there is also a function available to get a given thread's 
stack and registers for the GC to scan.

There is such a function here, but it would appear to be deprecated / up 
for removal once some ancient version of Java is no longer supported.

https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/blob/80040569a359c61120972d882d97428e80dcab90/usr/src/lib/libc/port/threads/thr.c#L2477-L2496

Iain.

Reply via email to