On Tue, 9 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > I don't think we should support any of these. We tightened up various > > cases of void in parameter lists in C2y (constraint "A parameter > > declaration shall not specify a void type, except for the special case of > > a single unnamed parameter of type void with no storage-class specifier, > > no type qualifier, and no following ellipsis terminator.", > > > > > replacing > > previous implicit UB), > > Could you please mention the paper number that did this? It would be > useful to read it.
This was N3344 (alternative 1 accepted in Minneapolis). -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
