On 9/12/25 16:44, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I found an old patch on my system that had editorial changes around the
documentation of -fprofile-partial-training. Surprisingly it did not apply
cleanly any more. When digging into it I found that
commit b9857b78a4afb7ccdb8ff3858b48d25b1df5ceb3
Author: Sandra Loosemore <sloosem...@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue Feb 11 21:52:36 2025 +0000
Doc: Fix some typos and other nearby sloppy-writing issues
I spotted some typos in the GCC manual. Since often these are a sign
that the text was inserted without being proofread, I looked at the
context and fixed some grammar/punctuation/wording issues as well.
gcc/ChangeLog
* doc/extend.texi: Fix a bunch of typos and other writing bugs.
* doc/invoke.texi: Likewise.
was the source of my conflicts.
In other words, Sandra beat me to (some of) it. :-)
I have not pushed this. Sandra, I'd much appreciate a review.
Looks OK to me except for this bit:
+the program later runs on.) With @code{-fprofile-partial-training}
+profile feedback is ignored for all functions not executed during the
+training runs, them being optimized as if they were compiled without
+profile feedback.
Maybe s/them being optimized/causing them to be optimized/ ??
-Sandra
