On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes (since i use this
script to post-process [per .sum file for stability]) - I looked through a few
of
the reported cases and they seem genuiene - but particularly in respect of
dg-final ones, hard to see how they can be disambiguated without we make
dg-final able to add some tag to differentiate.
are there any plans to deal with this new reported data?
if not, I’d welcome a switch on the script - so that one could at least elect
only to report new dups ..
Yea. I need to go through my results as well, it was a bit overwhelming.
Given the filename, opt flags and scan string are in the testname, it's
a bit surprising to hear that the dg-finals are triggering :(
jeff
