On Fri, 10 Oct 2025, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > Questions for others: > 1) We'd like to double-check that this sounds like a problem before trying to > change it. > 2) Does this trigger thoughts of anything else to look out for? > 3) Would the best solution be to add some `--as-needed` push/pop state > arguments into the link line?
Yes, I'd expect libstdc++ to be linked (DT_NEEDED) with libatomic only if it actually has undefined references that libatomic resolves. -- Joseph S. Myers [email protected]
