This assertion was never correct, but for some reason it passed locally
on two separate build trees when testing. Pushing the fix as obvious,
after re-testing on fresh build trees that did complain :)
-- >8 --
This assertion, despite what I said in r16-4070, is not valid: we can
reach here when deduping a VAR_DECL that didn't get a LANG_SPECIFIC in
the current TU. It's still correct to always use lang_cplusplus however
as for anything else the decl would have been created with an
appropriate LANG_SPECIFIC to start with.
PR c++/122015
PR c++/122019
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* module.cc (trees_in::install_entity): Remove incorrect
assertion.
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <[email protected]>
---
gcc/cp/module.cc | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
index 7b69e806328..be873c19295 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
@@ -8149,7 +8149,6 @@ trees_in::install_entity (tree decl)
if (!DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (not_tmpl))
{
maybe_add_lang_decl_raw (not_tmpl, false);
- gcc_checking_assert (!VAR_OR_FUNCTION_DECL_P (not_tmpl));
SET_DECL_LANGUAGE (not_tmpl, lang_cplusplus);
}
DECL_MODULE_ENTITY_P (not_tmpl) = true;
--
2.51.0
