On 2025-10-09 21:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
> git am didn't like this patch, complaining "corrupt patch at line 58",
> because the diff hunk header says that the new contents have 11 lines but
> there are actually only 9. I wonder how that happened?
>
> After editing the diff by hand it applied, and I've pushed it to trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
Sorry for sending a broken patch! Must've had issues with neovim buffers
when i was taking the old patch and copying the body, and somehow kept
the old diff hunk header. I'll be more careful next time.
Thanks,
Egas
