Hi All, The comment in the patch and the ChangeLog explains this one and a half liner adequately. The irony is that the error test was removed because an error return was being called, which caused failures in valid cases.
Regtests on FC42/x86_64. Variants of the testcase, mentioned in the PR, have been tested. OK for mainline? Paul
Change.Logs
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index f00f0e11378..3761b6589e8 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -4038,7 +4038,15 @@ gfc_get_pdt_instance (gfc_actual_arglist *param_list, gfc_symbol **sym,
}
kind_value = 0;
- gfc_extract_int (kind_expr, &kind_value);
+ /* This can come about during the parsing of nested pdt_templates. An
+ error arises because the KIND parameter expression has not been
+ provided. Use the template instead of an incorrect instance. */
+ if (gfc_extract_int (kind_expr, &kind_value))
+ {
+ gfc_free_actual_arglist (type_param_spec_list);
+ return MATCH_YES;
+ }
+
sprintf (name + strlen (name), "_%d", kind_value);
if (!name_seen && actual_param)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_52.f03 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_52.f03
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..40591bffc48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_52.f03
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! Test the fix for PR122089 in which an error occured in compiling the module
+! because a spurios REAL(KIND=0) was being produced for 'values_'.
+!
+! Contributed by Damian Rouson <[email protected]>
+!
+module tensor_m
+ implicit none
+
+ type tensor_t(k)
+ integer, kind :: k = kind(1.)
+ real(k), allocatable :: values_
+ end type
+
+ type input_output_pair_t(k)
+ integer, kind :: k
+ type(tensor_t(k)) inputs_, expected_outputs_
+ end type
+
+ type mini_batch_t(k)
+ integer, kind :: k
+ type(input_output_pair_t(k)) input_output_pairs_
+ end type
+
+end module tensor_m
+
+ use tensor_m
+ type (mini_batch_t(k = kind(1d0))) :: x
+ allocate (x%input_output_pairs_%inputs_%values_, source = 42d0)
+ print *, kind (x%input_output_pairs_%inputs_%values_), x%input_output_pairs_%inputs_%values_
+ deallocate (x%input_output_pairs_%inputs_%values_)
+end
