> Ugh, I missed two "s/also/not/"... I thought I checked that. And of course it > had to be the top one, somehow. I can make that change.
I just read up to the first ;) Looks like the last one is also missing the not. > Are the other ones OK? IMHO yes but I cannot approve. Maybe you also want to make explicit that we just perform costing (and record the cost in COST_VEC) if COST_VEC is passed? Looks like cost_vec isn't even documented so far. -- Regards Robin
