On 10/13/25 4:41 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trun/kbackports?
OK.
-- >8 -- Since a mem-initializer needs to be able to initialize any base class, we in turn need to make mem-initializer-id qualified name lookup type-only too. PR c++/122192 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_mem_initializer_id): Pass class_type instead of typename_to to cp_parser_class_name in the nested-name-specifier case. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C: Verify mem-initializer-id qualified name lookup is type-only too. --- gcc/cp/parser.cc | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc index 1ed2f3767e1c..9280632d47b8 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc @@ -19091,7 +19091,7 @@ cp_parser_mem_initializer_id (cp_parser* parser) return cp_parser_class_name (parser, /*typename_keyword_p=*/true, /*template_keyword_p=*/template_p, - typename_type, + class_type, /*check_dependency_p=*/true, /*class_head_p=*/false, /*is_declaration=*/true); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C index b4bc5c279a58..9f2a7a23923f 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-base6.C @@ -8,5 +8,7 @@ struct A {struct S1 : A::B { }; // OK -template<class T> struct S2 : T::B { }; // OK, used to fail+template<class T> struct S2 : T::B { // OK, used to fail + S2() : T::B() { } // Also OK +}; template struct S2<A>;
