On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Richard Henderson wrote: > Looks ok. Thanks, Richard. I applied the patch with a slightly enhanced changelog (one entry was missing).
> Some of the defines in i386/openbsdelf.h look redundant with either > i386/gas.h or i386/x86_64.h or both. But I won't quibble about that > since there are other files in i386/ that ought to get cleaned up > for the same reasons. Mark, can you please have a look and submit a follow-up patch that simplifies things along these lines? Gerald
