Hi Joseph,

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 10:08:31PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Here's a second attempt at implementing these two operators.
> > They're implemented as proposed in n3628, but differ slightly in that
> > they reject _Bool (the first commit message details a bit more about
> > this).
> 
> I disagree with that language design choice.

I'm aware.  Thanks!

> In any case these patches aren't actually suitable for consideration at 
> present, given that the represent as part of C2y something that has not so 
> far been accepted into C2y.

Okay, I'll resend as GNU extension (thus, adjusting diagnostics).  If
I do that, should I keep the name as _Maxof, or should I use __maxof__?

> 
> >     +ERROR: couldn't compile regular expression pattern: parentheses () not 
> > balanced
> 
> That seems self-explanatory enough to me.  If you want a dg-* directive to 
> match a literal ( or ), then you need to use \\( or \\) (one level of 
> escaping for the string, one for the regular expression).

Ahh, now it makes sense.  These issues must have appeared when I did
a trivial change to the dg-error messages, to include the parentheses.
I'll fix that.  Thanks!


Have a lovely night!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to