On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 6:32 PM Tomasz Kaminski <[email protected]> wrote: > > There was a paper submitted before Kona: p3862r0 Postpone > basic_string::subview and wait for cstring_view [1], > that according to github papers status [2] have also NB comment. I was not > able to locale the comment thou. > So maybe it would be good to have this as patch series for string_view (that > would contain feature test macro) and then string, > so we can revert later? > > > [1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3862r0.html# > [2] https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2466 >
Thanks for the info! Could you elaborate more on how making this a patch series helps with reverting? My understanding of P3862R0 is that it proposed two wording options: one to entirely remove the subview for string and string_view, and the other to remove the default parameter argument.
