On 11/24/25 3:55 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
I don't have issues with going forward here but not that we're past stage 1 and
this is not really a regression. The changes in all of these are very
mechanical so the risk is low (and I would be OK with it) but I'd still like
some consensus.
Kito, Jeff, any opinion? We can also discuss tomorrow in the sync call.
Pan, do you know how many of those are left or in your plan still?
I'll only be around for ~5 minutes tomorrow as I have a personal item to
attend to. So I probably can't really lead or participate in that
discussion.
I agree the risk is low, but it's also the case that we need to draw the
line somewhere and Richi is communicating the deadlines well in advance
so that folks aren't surprised.
I'd be OK with letting it through given its risk profile, but we do need
to wrap up the stage1 efforts.
Jeff
