On 11/26/25 2:02 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/25 7:07 PM, feedable wrote:
Add scan-weak function to testsuite, which would work like scan-hidden,
and allow for format-specific regexes
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c | 16 +++++-----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-10.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-11.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-15.c | 8 ++---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-16.c | 4 +--
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c | 10 +++---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c | 14 ++++-----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c | 24 +++++++--------
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-9.c | 8 ++---
gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
11 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
So from a technical standpoint I don't see any concerns with this
patchkit. What I don't see is a DCO signoff or copyright assignment
for you.
Can you confirm that you're contributing under the terms of the DCO?
https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html
Jeff
Actually, I'd like to go through the assignment process. Can you send me
the templates to sign that instead?
