On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:00:22PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The logic with the above hunk in the patch was that we're going to
> > use the inbranch clone only iff LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P, so it's
> > OK to always apply this penalty (if that very penalty there makes
> > sense at all, which I did not question when writing the patch).
>
> So I'm stuck here without further clarification of why you think
> that we need this_badness_inbranch? Is the original patch OK?
The original patch is ok.
Jakub
