On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Pietro Monteiro wrote: > They should be sent to both the Algol 68 list and gcc-patches.
Makes sense. > Suggested-by: Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Pietro Monteiro <[email protected]> For changes like these, that update existing Algol 68 material or add relevant updates to other pleses, feel free to push and just share on gcc-patches. This is just an offer, not a request - I am happy to review and approve anything wwwdocs. For wwwdocs changes, would you mind adding [wwwdocs] to the mail subject per our conventions? This makes them stand out for people interested (and indeed I do have filters). > end of GCC, and the corresponding runtime library. Patches to ga68 > - and libga68 should go to this list.</li> > + and libga68 should be sent to both this list and <b>gcc-patches</b>.</li> Looks good, thank you. I have, over the years, read and been told to prefer active tense in technical documentation. If you agree, you could rephrase this as "Send patches for ga68 and libga68 to both this list and <b>gcc-patches</b>" or similar. (This is not a requirement; the patch is fine either way.) Gerald
