> From: Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2025 8:14 AM
> 
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2025, Haochen Jiang wrote:
> 
> Maybe add "any longer" at the end?
> 
> > +    Based on ISA extensions enabled on Alder Lake, the switch intially 
> > further
> > +    enables the AVX-IFMA, AVX-NE-CONVERT, AVX-VNNI-INT8 and CMPccXADD ISA
> > +    extensions. Since GCC 13.2, ENQCMD and UINTR are further enabled.
> 
> Typo, "initially".
> 
> Though how about saying "this switch in addition enables ... Since GCC
> 13.2, ENQCMD and UINTR are enabled as well"?

Should I also unify the wording to "in addition" from "further" in other
scenario, i.e., other march options?

> 
> > +  <li><code>-mavx10.1-256</code>, <code>-mavx10.1-512</code>, and
> > +    <code>-mevex512</code> were removed together with the warning for the
> > +    behavior change on <code>-mavx10.1</code>. <code>-mavx10.1</code> has
> > +    enabled AVX10.1 intrinsics with 512-bit vector support since GCC 15.
> 
> Just to make sure: the warning was removed? If so, all good.

Yes they were removed.

> 
> Wow, that's quite a bit. Thanks for your careful work tracking all these!
> 
> (Patch is okay.)

I will apply all the suggestions in the thread.

Thx,
Haochen

Reply via email to