> Also, Jack, why is the variable called ac_cv_x86_rdrand rather than > glibcxx_x86_rdrand to be consistent with every other variable in > libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4? And why _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND not something > like _GLIBCXX_HAVE_AS_X86_RDRAND? The bootstrap failure is fixed, but
Although I cannot answer for Jack, let me note that this was so in the original non-working patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28127 Aren't the "c++ runtime libs" maintainers know what they are doing? > I think we should change those names. You are on the driver seat;-) Dominique
