On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 07:25:44PM +0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/28/26 6:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 06:28:04PM +0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > There was also a suggestion that we accept the corresponding
> > > > [[clang::trivial_abi]] spelling. I believe it can be done in a separate
> > > > patch.
> > >
> > > It seems like when Clang adopts gnu:: attributes, they keep the gnu::
> > > spelling; we might want to do the same for Clang attributes. That is,
> > > support clang::trivial_abi and not add gnu::trivial_abi.
> >
> > Though, e.g. for musttail we just added [[gnu::musttail]] and support
> > [[clang::musttail]] with the same meaning.
>
> It seems to me that supporting gnu:: and clang:: with the same semantics
> just complicates code portability; if the goal is to handle existing code,
> that means supporting the existing spelling.
Ok.
Jakub
