On 29/01/2026 15:55, Christopher Bazley via Sourceware Forge wrote:
> From: Christopher Bazley <[email protected]>
> 
> This test was trying to set the architecture directly instead of
> using the framework. The queried options were previously ignored.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c: Fix dgdirectives.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c
> index 23207fd98c84..607e87d260a8 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_hard_vfp_ok }  */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v7a_ok } */
> -/* { dg-options "-march=armv7-a -mfpu=vfp -fstack-protector-all -Os 
> -mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-offset=1296 -mtp=cp15" } 
> */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v7a_fp_hard_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-fstack-protector-all -Os -mstack-protector-guard=tls 
> -mstack-protector-guard-offset=1296 -mtp=cp15" } */
> +/* { dg-add-options arm_arch_v7a_fp_hard } */
>  
>  #include "stack-protector-5.c"
>  

Thanks, committed.

R.

Reply via email to