On Jan 31, 2026, Jeffrey Law <[email protected]> wrote: > In general we haven't put much time (yet) into making dynamic-lmul > real. Though I think everyone involved in the RVV effort expects > that over time good support for dynamic lmul is where we want to go.
> FWIW, a larger LMUL isn't always a win, even if it doesn't trigger > spilling or anything like that. But my hope is that with few > exceptions that a larger LMUL doesn't hurt performance in the future > (it certainly can right now on current designs). Cool, thanks for the tips, they're very welcome. This has been my very first close encounter of the third kind :-) with RVV, and it's been quite exciting, but I've still got a long way to go to be able to label myself as familiar with it :-) -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
