On 2/2/26 12:28 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry!
--- snip ---
I meant: do all platforms which *we* support implement real(10)?
You could
% grep -r __GFC_REAL_10__ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/
I will investigate this further.
for similar solutions.
--- snip ---
Let's see:
13.7.2.3.6 EX editing
The EXw.d and EXw.dEe edit descriptors indicate that the external field
occupies w positions, except when w is zero in which case the processor
selects the field width. The fractional part of the field contains d
hexadecimal digits, except when d is zero in which case the processor
selects the number of hexadecimal digits to be the minimum required so
that the output field is equal to the internal value; ...
But -0XF.FFFFFP+124 is shorter than -0X1.FFFFFEP+127, so I think
you should recheck. Sorry for the extra work ;-)
I am very aware of this. My interpretation is "in which case the processor
selects" the number of hexadecimal digits to be what ever minimum it chooses
to produce. Keep in mind this is using the built-in C functions to generate
the hex string so we do not have a bit string to deal with. The value is correct
and it is the minimum the processor produces.
Anyone else one to way in on this? I sure don't want to create custom code bit
shift this.
Thanks for that.
We're getting closer... Eagerly waiting for version 3 ;-)
Best,
Harald
Best,
Harald
--- snip ---
Thanks for the review. I will fix these and resubmit.
Jerry
