On Mon, 2026-02-02 at 19:14 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 2, 2026, David Malcolm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Alex, does this look OK to you? > > It does, I'd be happy with it. > > I'd be happier if we didn't have to check for whether it was > prefixed, > and instead called some common code to do the prefixing earlier, but > I > worry about other consequences of doing that earlier. > > So this is probably the conservative way to go at this point of the > development cycle.
Thanks. Given that, Richi's RM approval, and that the analyzer integration tests ran successfully with the v2 patch, I've gone ahead and pushed the v2 patch to trunk as r16-7248-g6fe28020cae53e. Dave
