On Wed, 4 Feb 2026, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 01:47:29PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So, I think we should do following instead.
> > Tested on x86_64-linux with
> > make -j32 -k check-gcc GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE=1 
> > RUNTESTFLAGS="GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE=1 dg.exp='*bitint* pr112673.c 
> > builtin-stdc-bit-*.c pr112566-2.c pr112511.c pr116588.c pr116003.c 
> > pr113693.c pr113602.c flex-array-counted-by-7.c' dg-torture.exp='*bitint* 
> > pr116480-2.c pr114312.c pr114121.c' dfp.exp=*bitint* 
> > vect.exp='vect-early-break_99-pr113287.c' tree-ssa.exp=pr113735.c"
> > so far, will bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and aarch64-linux
> > tonight.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested successfully on all 3, also bootstrapped on
> s390x-linux (though make check is still running).
> 
> Ok for trunk?

OK.

> > 2026-02-03  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>
> > 
> >     PR middle-end/122689
> >     * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (gimple_lower_bitint): For the PHI handling
> >     if min_prec == prec, break after emitting assignment from c.
> > 
> >     * gcc.dg/bitint-127.c: New test.
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <[email protected]>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to