On Tuesday, February 10th, 2026 at 5:38 PM, Marek Polacek <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 05:32:22PM +0000, Boris Staletic wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 10th, 2026 at 4:49 PM, Marek Polacek 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 03:26:37PM +0000, Boris Staletic wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, February 10th, 2026 at 2:05 PM, Jason Merrill 
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Snipped older discussions for brevity.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's a v2 of the patch, bootstrapped and tested on 
> > > > > > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> > > > > > -- >8 --
> > > > > > In case of expressions like `&[:expr:]` where `expr` depends on a
> > > > > > template parameter, and the splice expression represents a 
> > > > > > `FIELD_DECL` or
> > > > > > a non-static member `FUNCTION_DECL`, that's exactly what we'd pass 
> > > > > > on.
> > > > > > However, `build_x_unary_op()` for these expressions is expecting an
> > > > > > `OFFSET_REF`. `OFFSET_REF` is also what gets passed to
> > > > > > `build_x_unary_op()` when templates are not involved.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There's also a difference between the template argument being a 
> > > > > > type and
> > > > > > using `members_of()` to get to the reflections of members (in which 
> > > > > > case
> > > > > > evaluating the `SPLICE_EXPR` returns a `FUNCTION_DECL` - 
> > > > > > `splice10.C`
> > > > > > test) and passing `^^T::member` as the template argument (in which 
> > > > > > case
> > > > > > evaluating the `SPLICE_EXPR` returns a `BASELINK` - `splice11.C`).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Staletic [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PR c++/123660
> > > > > > PR c++/123661
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * pt.cc (tsubst_splice_expr): Handle pointers to non-static members
> > > > > > from splice expressions
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C: New test.
> > > > > > * g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C: New test.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > gcc/cp/pt.cc | 14 ++++++++++++
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C | 28 
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C | 29 
> > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C
> > > > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > > > > > index 049bbf07e0..0c0076c9a4 100644
> > > > > > --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > > > > > +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > > > > > @@ -16755,6 +16755,20 @@ tsubst_splice_expr (tree t, tree args, 
> > > > > > tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl)
> > > > > > op = splice (op);
> > > > > > if (op == error_mark_node)
> > > > > > return error_mark_node;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (SPLICE_EXPR_ADDRESS_P (t) && !TREE_STATIC (TREE_TYPE (op)))
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TREE_STATIC on a type isn't meaningful, the checks below are enough.
> > > >
> > > > I thought that was fishy... You're right, everything works without that 
> > > > check.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > + {
> > > > > > + if (TREE_CODE (op) == BASELINK
> > > > > > + && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (op)) == METHOD_TYPE)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It shouldn't be necessary to check for METHOD_TYPE; any class member 
> > > > > is
> > > > > suitable for passing to build_offset_ref. If the argument is static,
> > > > > it'll return it unchanged rather than actually build an OFFSET_REF.
> > > >
> > > > If I drop the METHOD_TYPE check, I get an ICE in both splice10.C and 
> > > > splice11.C.
> > > > splice10.C ICEs when calling `build_offset_ref()` on a static member 
> > > > function (s::get_y).
> > > > splice11.C ICEs when calling `build_offset_ref()` on a free function 
> > > > (::f).
> > > >
> > > > That's why I was initially looking for a way to do this only for 
> > > > non-static members.
> > >
> > > I think Jason meant the check for METHOD_TYPE for a BASELINK, which
> > > is certainly not needed.  Please also use BASELINK_P instead of
> > > TREE_CODE == BASELINK.
> > >
> > > We shouldn't call build_offset_ref on static member functions or
> > > free functions.  So I think the second call to build_offset_ref
> > > should be guarded by
> > >
> > >   TREE_CODE (op) == FIELD_DECL || DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (op)
> > >
> > > But maybe Jason prefers something else.
> > >
> > >
> > > I would also move the SPLICE_EXPR_ADDRESS_P block after checking
> > > dependent_splice_p and after check_splice_expr.
> >
> > Okay, all of that works. One question:
> > Would it be more correct to guard the whole block with
> >
> > if (SPLICE_EXPR_ADDRESS_P (t))
> >
> > or
> >
> > if (SPLICE_EXPR_ADDRESS_P (op))
> >
> > Given what's in the dependent_splice_p block, I'm thinking latter, but I'm 
> > not sure.
> 
> It should check t, because op won't be a SPLICE_EXPR (except in the
> dependent_splice_p block).
> 
> Marek
> 

In that case, here's the updated patch:
-- >8 --
In case of expressions like `&[:expr:]` where `expr` depends on a
template parameter, and the splice expression represents a `FIELD_DECL` or
a non-static member `FUNCTION_DECL`, that's exactly what we'd pass on.
However, `build_x_unary_op()` for these expressions is expecting an
`OFFSET_REF`. `OFFSET_REF` is also what gets passed to
`build_x_unary_op()` when templates are not involved.

There's also a difference between the template argument being a type and
using `members_of()` to get to the reflections of members (in which case
evaluating the `SPLICE_EXPR` returns a `FUNCTION_DECL` - `splice10.C`
test) and passing `^^T::member` as the template argument (in which case
evaluating the `SPLICE_EXPR` returns a `BASELINK` - `splice11.C`).

Signed-off-by: Boris Staletic <[email protected]>

        PR c++/123660
        PR c++/123661

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * pt.cc (tsubst_splice_expr): Handle pointers to non-static members
        from splice expressions

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                            | 12 ++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 049bbf07e0..333ecc3130 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -16771,6 +16771,18 @@ tsubst_splice_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain, tree in_decl)
                             SPLICE_EXPR_MEMBER_ACCESS_P (t),
                             (complain & tf_error)))
     return error_mark_node;
+
+  if (SPLICE_EXPR_ADDRESS_P (t))
+    {
+      if (BASELINK_P (op))
+       op = build_offset_ref (BINFO_TYPE (BASELINK_ACCESS_BINFO (op)), op,
+                              /*address_p=*/true, complain);
+      else if (TREE_CODE (op) == FIELD_DECL
+              || DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (op))
+       op = build_offset_ref (DECL_CONTEXT (op), op,
+                              /*address_p=*/true, complain);
+    }
+
   if (outer_automatic_var_p (op))
     op = process_outer_var_ref (op, complain);
   /* Like in cp_parser_splice_expression, for foo.[: bar :]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2f335ea8fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// PR c++/123660
+// PR c++/123661
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-freflection" }
+
+#include <meta>
+
+struct s {
+  int get_z(this s) { return 4; }
+  static int get_y() { return 4; }
+  int get_x() { return 3; }
+  int xx;
+  static int xxx;
+};
+
+int s::xxx = 5;
+
+template<typename T, decltype(0uz) I>
+constexpr auto test() {
+  constexpr auto ctx = std::meta::access_context::current();
+  return &[:members_of(^^T, ctx)[I]:];
+}
+
+static_assert(test<s, 0uz>() == &s::get_z);
+static_assert(test<s, 1uz>() == &s::get_y);
+static_assert(test<s, 2uz>() == &s::get_x);
+static_assert(test<s, 3uz>() == &s::xx);
+static_assert(test<s, 4uz>() == &s::xxx);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b62fdcc5ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// PR c++/123660
+// PR c++/123661
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-freflection" }
+
+#include <meta>
+
+void f() {}
+struct s {
+  int get_z(this s) { return 4; }
+  static int get_y() { return 4; }
+  int get_x() { return 3; }
+  int xx;
+  static int xxx;
+};
+
+int s::xxx = 5;
+
+template<std::meta::info refl_expr>
+constexpr auto test() {
+  return &[:refl_expr:];
+}
+
+static_assert(test<^^s::get_z>() == &s::get_z);
+static_assert(test<^^s::get_y>() == &s::get_y);
+static_assert(test<^^s::get_x>() == &s::get_x);
+static_assert(test<^^s::xx>() == &s::xx);
+static_assert(test<^^s::xxx>() == &s::xxx);
+static_assert(test<^^f>() == &f);
-- 
2.51.1

Reply via email to