On 14/09/12 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:27:27AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81.c: New test. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81-2.c: Same. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp82.c: Same. > > Why not vrp82.c, vrp83.c and vrp84.c (and rename the recently added > vrp80-2.c test to vrp81.c)? >
My thinking behind this was the following: vrp80.c and vrp80-2.c are 2 versions of more or less the same code. In one version, we test whether the inclusive bounds of the range are folded. In the other version we test whether the exclusive bounds of the range are not folded. Given that rationale, should I leave the names like this or rename them? Thanks, - Tom > Jakub >
