Hi,
On 09/23/2012 12:08 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I detect this regression while running performance tests. I think
it comes from:
2012-04-12 Benjamin Kosnik <b...@redhat.com>
* include/bits/unordered_map.h (__unordered_map): Remove.
(__unordered_multimap): Remove.
Add aliases for __umap_traits, __umap_hashtable, __ummap_traits,
__ummap_hashtable.
(unordered_map): Derive from __umap_hashtable.
(unordered_multimap): Derive from __ummap_hashtable.
* include/bits/unordered_set.h (__unordered_set): Remove.
(__unordered_multiset): Remove.
...
2012-09-19 François Dumont <fdum...@gcc.gnu.org>
* testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert_erase/41975.cc: Use
__uset_hashtable rather than now missing __unordered_set.
Ok to commit ?
Given the current code, I think it qualifies as obvious. Anyway, too bad
anyway that we don't have anymore the __unordered_* names for the
extension containers taking an additional parameter, seemed very natural.
By the way, Francois, I think it's time to commit the patch for
44436... and thanks again!
Thanks,
Paolo.
